Sunday, March 6, 2011

School Spending: not helping

This is a VERY powerful piece written by a teacher.  We continue to hear from Teacher unions that the issues is money.  This opinion piece from the Dallas Morning News says otherwise - it originally appeared in the City Journal.


Gerry Garibaldi: Schools where kids have kids and learning dies

In my short time as a teacher in Connecticut, I have muddled through President George W. Bush’s No Child Left Behind Act, which tied federal funding of schools to various reforms, and through President Barack Obama’s Race to the Top initiative, which does much the same thing, though with different benchmarks.
Thanks to the feds, urban schools like mine — already entitled to substantial federal largesse under Title I, which provides funds to public schools with large low-income populations — are swimming in money. At my school, we pay five teachers to tutor kids after school and on Saturdays. They sit in classrooms waiting for kids who never show up. We don’t want for books — or for any of the cutting-edge gizmos that non-Title I schools can’t afford: computerized whiteboards, Elmo projectors, the works. Our facility is state-of-the-art, thanks to a recent $40 million face-lift, with gleaming new hallways and bathrooms and a fully computerized library.
Here’s my prediction: The money, the reforms, the gleaming porcelain, the hopeful rhetoric about saving our children — all of it will have a limited impact, at best, on most city schoolchildren. Urban teachers face an intractable problem, one that we cannot spend or even teach our way out of: teen pregnancy. This year, all of my favorite girls are pregnant, four in all, future unwed mothers every one. There will be no innovation in this quarter, no race to the top. Personal moral accountability is the electrified rail that no politician wants to touch.